Industrial maintenance in the UK is moving into a year where digital tools will influence how faults are predicted, how work is assigned, and how quickly teams can bring equipment back online. The strongest change is not a single breakthrough, but the way several technologies are now arriving together, driven by tighter labour markets, higher uptime expectations, and a growing appetite for evidence that maintenance spend is reducing risk rather than merely reacting to it.
Chris Burns, Global Marketing Communications Director at HTL Group, a leading provider of hydraulic torque wrenches and controlled bolting solutions, explores five technologies that maintenance leaders will be weighing in 2026, with a focus on where they deliver real operational value and where teams tend to underestimate the effort required.
AI-powered predictive maintenance
Predictive maintenance delivers value in 2026 only when it alters how maintenance work is planned. Alerts prevent breakdowns when they raise work orders, pull parts forward, and secure time in a maintenance window. If alerts stay in dashboards and reviews, stoppages still arrive as emergencies. Predictive maintenance has been shown to reduce machine downtime by 30–50% and extend machine life by 20–40%, but those gains depend on operational follow-through, not analytics alone.
If a business can’t agree on which assets matter and what action follows an alert, the investment won’t pay back. Teams that see improvement usually limit scope to a small number of assets that repeatedly disrupt production and define one clear response per trigger. Where CMMS data is unreliable or responsibilities are unclear, predictive tools add noise rather than resilience.
ALSO READ: GLOBAL INVACOM APPOINTS CRAIG BOWLEY AS CHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER
Digital twins
Digital twins become relevant to maintenance teams in 2026 when fixed service intervals no longer reflect how equipment is actually being used. Assets running under variable load, frequent changeovers, or harsher operating conditions need maintenance decisions based on evidence, not averages.
Investment makes sense when a digital twin helps planners decide whether an asset can safely run to the next stop or needs earlier attention. UK manufacturing programmes already point in this direction, where digital twins combined with real-time data and AI analytics are being applied to support predictive maintenance. Businesses should fund this only if they intend to use the output to adjust inspection timing or shutdown scope. If the model sits alongside planning without changing decisions, it adds cost without operational benefit.
Condition monitoring
Most manufacturers already collect condition data. The decision for 2026 is whether that data consistently leads to action. Condition monitoring earns its keep when abnormal trends result in planned work, rather than discussion or delay.
Consistency matters more than coverage. ISO 17359 sets out how condition monitoring programmes should be structured and governed, which is relevant for businesses struggling with different decisions across shifts or sites. Investment is justified when the organisation is ready to standardise thresholds, review routines, and escalation rules so that findings flow directly into the maintenance plan. If the data cannot be trusted or does not trigger scheduled work, adding more sensors will not improve outcomes.
Augmented reality for remote diagnostics
Remote diagnostics becomes a sensible investment in 2026 when access to specialist knowledge is the limiting factor in maintenance response. As experienced engineers cover more sites, waiting for the right person to attend can extend downtime far beyond the repair itself.
AR-based remote support helps when technicians can share a live view of a fault and receive guidance immediately. This approach reflects how remote experts and on-site technicians can work together on industrial maintenance tasks. Businesses should invest only if they can clearly identify the jobs were remote input changes outcomes, such as complex faults or safety-critical procedures. Without defined use cases and controlled procedures, the technology risks becoming an unused add-on.
Connectivity and autonomous inspection
Connectivity becomes a maintenance issue in 2026 when poor coverage slows diagnosis, inspection, or remote support. Large sites, heavy steel environments, and outdoor assets often expose the limits of standard Wi-Fi, directly affecting response times.
UK manufacturing trials show that deploying operational networks in industrial environments requires significantly more effort than typical Wi-Fi installations, which means funding only holds up where a clear maintenance use case exists. The same applies to autonomous inspection. As UK rules now allow wider use of drones for long-distance infrastructure inspection, the benefit appears when inspection data feeds straight into maintenance planning, as shown by inspection imagery being used to inform maintenance and investment decisions. Without a workflow to act on that data, complexity rises while reliability doesn’t.
Making smart investments for the year ahead
Digital maintenance investments tend to deliver value when they reduce uncertainty for planners and technicians, rather than merely generating more data. A sensible 2026 approach is to choose one or two technologies that solve a clear operational bottleneck, then build the supporting disciplines around them: data quality, workflow integration, training, and governance. When that foundation is in place, scaling becomes much less painful, and teams have a better chance of turning digital ambition into measurable uptime.
